Memory training improved the memory skill it trained, but other gains were small.
HelpedThe short version
Across the studies, memory training improved the skills it trained more than the other groups did.

- 30
- studies pooled
- 1,601
- children aged 3 to 16
- 1 tool
- tested
The review
Who took part
1,601 children aged 3 to 16 took part, in 25 studies. None had ADHD, a learning disability, low IQ or weak memory.
What they did
Children did memory training that works the mind's workspace, where information is held and used. The other groups either did no training or did a different activity.
What happened
Children got better at the memory tasks they trained, and the gain lasted several months, but gains on other skills were small. Maths rose a little, but not in studies that put children into groups by chance, and the authors doubted it. Literacy and reasoning ability showed no clear gain.
What the review found
- HelpedOther outcomes
Across the studies, memory training improved the skills it trained more than the other groups did.
Pooled analysis of 30 studies · vs groups that did no training or another task · ⚠ mixes trials with other kinds of study
- HelpedOther outcomes
Across the studies, training gave only a small gain on other skills.
Pooled analysis of 74 studies · vs groups that did no training or another task · ⚠ mixes trials with other kinds of study
- HelpedGoals
Training gave a small maths gain, but only where children were not put into groups by chance.
Pooled analysis of 17 studies · vs groups that did no training or another task · ⚠ mixes trials with other kinds of study
- No differenceGoals
Across the studies, training made no clear difference to word reading.
Pooled analysis of 17 studies · vs groups that did no training or another task · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished; mixes trials with other kinds of study
How solid is this?
- Large group
- Mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Signs that small negative studies went unpublished
Source
Working memory training in typically developing children: a meta-analysis of the available evidence (2017)
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000265 (opens in a new tab)

