Feedback and seeing others succeed may build belief in getting active
HelpedThe short version
Across 27 studies, belief in being active rose a little more than in the other groups.

- 27
- studies pooled
- 5,501
- healthy adults in physical activity programmes
- Self-rated
- people rated themselves
- 3 tools
- tested
The review
Who took part
27 studies with 5,501 healthy adults, about 200 people per study. Children, students, athletes, people with a long-term health problem and groups with an average age of 60 or more were left out.
What they did
Each study tried to build belief that people could be more active, mostly through everyday activity such as walking. Programmes ranged from a few minutes to two years, and each study was checked for its methods.
What happened
Overall, belief rose a little more than in other groups. Feedback on past results or on others, and seeing similar people succeed, led to bigger rises. Graded mastery, barrier identification and problem solving led to smaller rises.
What the review found
- Helped
Across 27 studies, belief in being active rose a little more than in the other groups.
Pooled analysis of 27 studies with 5,501 people · vs people in the other groups · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
Across six tests, feedback on past results left people surer about being active than the other groups.
Pooled analysis of 6 studies with 919 people · vs people in the other groups · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
Across five tests, feedback on how others did left people surer about being active than the other groups.
Pooled analysis of 5 studies with 799 people · vs people in the other groups · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
Across nine tests, those who saw similar people succeed felt surer than the other groups.
Pooled analysis of 9 studies with 2,151 people · vs people in the other groups · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
How solid is this?
- Large group
- People rated themselves
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Mixes trials with other kinds of study
Source
What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis (2010)
DOI: 10.1348/135910709X461752 (opens in a new tab)

