ÜBERMAD

GoalsReview

Programmes may help obese adults move more; confidence rose only a little.

HelpedThe short version

Across 42 comparisons, programmes helped obese adults move more.

A woman in a striped top and checked trousers digs a garden bed with a spade, lifting soil in slow, steady strokes.
42
studies pooled
3 tools
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    The review covers 58 studies of obese adults, about 49 years old on average. Most of the people were women, and each comparison averaged about 181 people.

  2. What they did

    Programmes used about 10 ways to change behaviour, such as goal setting and tracking progress. The other groups used almost none.

  3. What happened

    Programmes raised physical activity by a medium amount, and confidence by a small amount. The two changes did not match up across the different techniques. Planning when and where to act tended to go with bigger gains in confidence.

What the review found

  1. HelpedGoals

    Across 42 comparisons, programmes helped obese adults move more.

    Pooled analysis of 42 studies · vs people who got nothing, or were checked before and after · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. Across 61 comparisons, programmes made obese adults a bit more sure they were able to move.

    Pooled analysis of 61 studies · vs people who got nothing, or were checked before and after · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. HelpedGoals

    Across 7 comparisons, programmes that taught people to use reminders or cues tended to get them to move more.

    Pooled analysis of 7 studies with 2,112 people · vs programmes that did not teach reminders or cues · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  4. Across 12 comparisons, programmes that had people plan when and where to act tended to give them more confidence.

    Pooled analysis of 12 studies with 1,563 people · vs programmes that did not plan when and where · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study
  • The review didn't check the studies' quality or look for missing studies

Source

What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals’ physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2013)

DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-29 (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all