ÜBERMAD

FocusReview

Training gave little gain in attention. Behaviour improved, mostly when compared with no treatment.

No differenceThe short version

Across 11 studies, training did not clearly improve attention more than the other group did.

A girl folds a big towel over and back on a table while a calm trainer sits still beside her.
11
studies pooled
905
children and teenagers, some with ADHD
Recorded
behaviour was recorded
2 tools
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    905 children and teenagers older than 5, in 22 studies from nine countries. Some had ADHD or brain injuries, some had learning difficulties, and others were healthy.

  2. What they did

    Training was computer exercises for attention and memory, or therapy courses that taught children to talk themselves through tasks. Programmes lasted from 1 to 6 months, and one lasted a year. The other group got no treatment or a different treatment.

  3. What happened

    Behaviour improved against no treatment. It did not clearly beat another treatment. Attention, memory and other thinking skills showed no clear gain, and school results only slightly.

What the review found

  1. No differenceFocus

    Across 11 studies, training did not clearly improve attention more than the other group did.

    Pooled analysis of 11 studies · vs children who got no treatment or a different treatment · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. No differenceOther outcomes

    On self-control and problem-solving tests, training did not clearly beat the other group.

    Pooled analysis of 12 studies · vs children who got no treatment or a different treatment · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. No differenceOther outcomes

    Across the memory tests, most studies found no effect, and two studies with big gains pulled up the average.

    Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs children who got no treatment or a different treatment · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  4. HelpedOther outcomes

    In 10 studies, children behaved better than the other group, mostly where it got no treatment.

    Pooled analysis of 10 studies · vs mostly children who got no treatment · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • Behaviour was recorded
  • Summary claims more than the results show
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study

Source

The Efficacy of Cognitive Training Programs in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-analysis (2013)

DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0643 (opens in a new tab)

More on focus

See all