Training in managing your own learning raised how well students did
HelpedThe short version
Students who got this training did better in their studies than the other groups did.

- 61
- studies pooled
- 1 tool
- tested
The review
Who took part
This review pooled 142 studies, most with undergraduate students. Some had graduate students, vocational learners, or people who learned at work.
What they did
Students were taught, or prompted, to use ways of managing their learning: planning, checking progress and judging their own work. Each study compared them with another group. The papers rarely said how long the training lasted.
What happened
In 61 studies the training raised results by a medium amount, and in 41 it raised use of these ways. Across 72 studies, students who used more of these ways tended to do better. Only a small part of the training's effect on results seemed to run through them.
What the review found
- Helped
Students who got this training did better in their studies than the other groups did.
Pooled analysis of 61 studies · vs groups with no training · ⚠ mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
Students who got this training used more ways of managing their own learning than the other groups did.
Pooled analysis of 41 studies · vs groups with no training · ⚠ the studies disagreed a lot; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- No comparison
Students who used more ways of managing their own learning tended to do better in their studies.
Pooled analysis of 72 studies · no comparison group · ⚠ the studies disagreed a lot; mixes trials with other kinds of study
How solid is this?
- Unclear how groups were picked
- Mixes trials with other kinds of study
Source
Self-Regulated Learning Partially Mediates the Effect of Self-Regulated Learning Interventions on Achievement in Higher Education: a Meta-Analysis (2019)
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100292 (opens in a new tab)

