ÜBERMAD

GoalsReview

Teaching study strategies may raise language test scores and make students more confident

HelpedThe short version

Across 13 comparisons, teaching study skills lifted test results more than other groups did.

A young woman with a bun runs one finger slowly across three tall columns of empty boxes on a card on a wooden table.
13
studies pooled
1,780
school and university language students
1 tool
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    1,780 students in 16 studies of second or foreign language learning, mostly English. Ten studies had university students and six had school pupils.

  2. What they did

    Students were taught to plan, check and reflect on their own learning. They were compared with other groups that did not get these lessons. Programmes ran for 9 to 80 hours in total, mostly in ordinary classes.

  3. What happened

    Compared with the other groups, test results improved a lot, and strategy use and confidence improved by a medium amount. The abstract and results give different sizes. The test-results figure also hints that small studies with weak results are missing.

What the review found

  1. HelpedGoals

    Across 13 comparisons, teaching study skills lifted test results more than other groups did.

    Pooled analysis of 13 studies · vs groups that did not get the lessons · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished; results look too good to be true; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. HelpedGoals

    In 6 comparisons, teaching study skills led to more strategy use than other groups.

    Pooled analysis of 6 studies · vs groups that did not get the lessons · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. In 5 comparisons, teaching study skills made students more sure of their language skills than other groups did.

    Pooled analysis of 5 studies · vs groups that did not get the lessons · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • Large group
  • Numbers unreliable
  • Results look too good to be true
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study
  • Signs that small negative studies went unpublished

Source

The effectiveness of self-regulated learning (SRL) interventions on L2 learning achievement, strategy employment and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic study (2022)

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021101 (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all