Teaching pupils ways to manage their own learning raised their school results.
HelpedThe short version
Primary pupils taught ways to manage their learning got better school results than the other groups.

- 8,619
- pupils in primary and secondary schools
- Recorded
- behaviour was recorded
- 1 tool
- tested
The review
Who took part
About 8,600 pupils in 74 studies took part, from grade 1 to grade 10. Primary pupils were in grades 1 to 6, and secondary pupils in grades 7 to 10.
What they did
The studies taught pupils ways of studying and checking their own learning, and compared them with pupils who got no such training. On average the training ran about 20 sessions, from 2 to 90. Researchers or regular teachers ran it.
What happened
Academic results rose in primary and secondary school. Motivation rose in primary school. Researchers' training gave bigger gains than teachers' training. The paper's count of secondary-school studies does not match its tables, so read the sizes with care.
What the review found
- HelpedGoals
Primary pupils taught ways to manage their learning got better school results than the other groups.
Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs pupils who got no such training · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- HelpedGoals
Secondary pupils taught ways to manage learning did better at school than the other groups.
Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs pupils who got no such training · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- HelpedMotivation
Primary pupils taught ways to manage their learning felt more motivated than the other groups.
Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs pupils who got no such training · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
How solid is this?
- Large group
- Behaviour was recorded
- Unclear how groups were picked
- Numbers unreliable
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Mixes trials with other kinds of study
- The review didn't check the studies' quality or look for missing studies
Source
Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level (2008)
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x (opens in a new tab)

