ÜBERMAD

GoalsReview

Teaching pupils ways to manage their own learning raised their school results.

HelpedThe short version

Primary pupils taught ways to manage their learning got better school results than the other groups.

A girl at a desk with an open workbook lifts headphones over her head, settles them on her ears, then draws them back down.
8,619
pupils in primary and secondary schools
Recorded
behaviour was recorded
1 tool
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    About 8,600 pupils in 74 studies took part, from grade 1 to grade 10. Primary pupils were in grades 1 to 6, and secondary pupils in grades 7 to 10.

  2. What they did

    The studies taught pupils ways of studying and checking their own learning, and compared them with pupils who got no such training. On average the training ran about 20 sessions, from 2 to 90. Researchers or regular teachers ran it.

  3. What happened

    Academic results rose in primary and secondary school. Motivation rose in primary school. Researchers' training gave bigger gains than teachers' training. The paper's count of secondary-school studies does not match its tables, so read the sizes with care.

What the review found

  1. HelpedGoals

    Primary pupils taught ways to manage their learning got better school results than the other groups.

    Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs pupils who got no such training · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. HelpedGoals

    Secondary pupils taught ways to manage learning did better at school than the other groups.

    Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs pupils who got no such training · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. Primary pupils taught ways to manage their learning felt more motivated than the other groups.

    Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs pupils who got no such training · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • Large group
  • Behaviour was recorded
  • Unclear how groups were picked
  • Numbers unreliable
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study
  • The review didn't check the studies' quality or look for missing studies

Source

Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level (2008)

DOI: 10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all