ÜBERMAD

MotivationPaper

A six-week diabetes program helped people feel more able in four of eight skills

MixedThe short version

Six weekly sessions made people feel more able in four areas, such as setting goals, but not in four others.

A woman at a table calmly loops an elastic band around a thick bundle of worksheets, over and back, again and again.
46
adults with diabetes in Michigan
Randomised
groups picked at random
Self-rated
people rated themselves
3 tools
tested

The study

  1. Who took part

    46 adults with diabetes were put into the program or a waiting list at random. Another 18 took part without random assignment, and 64 were counted in all. Most were middle-aged women, and more than half used insulin.

  2. What they did

    People in the program met six times, once a week for two hours, in groups. They worked through 21 worksheets on goals, problem solving, coping and stress. The waiting group got nothing for six weeks, then took the same program.

  3. What happened

    Compared with the waiting group, the program group felt more able in four of eight skills, such as setting goals. Their attitudes to diabetes also improved on two of five measures. Average blood sugar fell from about 11.8% to 11.0% in the program group, while the waiting group barely changed.

What the study found

  1. Six weekly sessions made people feel more able in four areas, such as setting goals, but not in four others.

    Small randomised trial of 46 adults with diabetes in Michigan · vs people who were on the waiting list · they rated themselves · ⚠ only counted people who finished; summary claims more than the results show

  2. MixedOther outcomes

    The program made people less negative about diabetes, but not more positive.

    Small randomised trial of 46 adults with diabetes in Michigan · vs people who were on the waiting list · they rated themselves · ⚠ only counted people who finished; summary claims more than the results show

  3. HelpedOther outcomes

    Blood sugar improved a little more in the program group, but the two groups were tested at different times.

    Small randomised trial of 46 adults with diabetes in Michigan · vs people who were on the waiting list · they rated themselves · ⚠ only counted people who finished; summary claims more than the results show

How solid is this?

  • Groups picked at random
  • Small group
  • People rated themselves
  • Only counted people who finished
  • Summary claims more than the results show

Source

Patient empowerment: results of a randomized controlled trial (1995)

More on motivation

See all