Coaching helped students reach their goals but did not cut putting things off
No differenceThe short version
Neither one-to-one coaching nor coaching in a group made people put things off less than the goal-only group did.

- 108
- university students in Austria
- Randomised
- groups picked at random
- Self-rated
- people rated themselves
- 1 tool
- tested
The study
Who took part
108 students at the University of Salzburg in Austria, 85 women and 23 men, with an average age of about 22. Seven of the 115 who began were left out for not relating to the topic.
What they did
Students first wrote goals about putting things off. One group then had a one-hour session alone with a coach. Another had a one-hour session in a group of 10 to 16. A third group only wrote goals and had a session later.
What happened
Both coaching groups reached their own goals more than the goal-only group did, but neither coaching group put things off less. One-to-one coaching also left students more committed to their goals, and more confident of reaching them, than the goal-only group. The paper's abstract goes further than its results, so treat the claims about one-to-one coaching with care.
What the study found
- No differenceProcrastination
Neither one-to-one coaching nor coaching in a group made people put things off less than the goal-only group did.
Randomised trial of 108 university students in Austria · vs the goal-only group · they rated themselves · ⚠ summary claims more than the results show
- HelpedGoals
Both kinds of coaching helped students reach their own goals more than the goal-only group did.
Randomised trial of 108 university students in Austria · vs the goal-only group · they rated themselves · ⚠ summary claims more than the results show
- HelpedMotivation
After one-to-one coaching, students were more committed to their goals than the goal-only group.
Randomised trial of 108 university students in Austria · vs the goal-only group · they rated themselves · ⚠ summary claims more than the results show
- HelpedMotivation
After one-to-one coaching, students felt more sure of reaching their goals than the goal-only group did.
Randomised trial of 108 university students in Austria · vs the goal-only group · they rated themselves · ⚠ summary claims more than the results show
How solid is this?
- Groups picked at random
- People rated themselves
- Summary claims more than the results show
Source
Leading to Effectiveness: Comparing Dyadic Coaching and Group Coaching (2015)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886315574331 (opens in a new tab)

