AR Biology lessons got students no more engaged than VR lessons
No differenceThe short version
Biology lessons with AR got students no more engaged than the same lessons with VR.

- 243
- high school Biology students in Nigeria
- Trial
- groups not picked at random
- Self-rated
- people rated themselves
The study
Who took part
243 Biology students in the next-to-last year of high school in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. 124 were in the AR group and 119 in the VR group.
What they did
Teachers who had a one-week course taught the same Biology topics to both groups over about four weeks. One group used augmented reality (AR) and the other virtual reality (VR), for example to move 3D models. No group had lessons without the tech.
What happened
Both groups felt much more engaged by the end and ended up about the same. With no tech-free group, we can't tell if the tech itself helped. The paper claims random groups without saying how, and gives the lessons as four and eight weeks.
What the study found
- No difference
Biology lessons with AR got students no more engaged than the same lessons with VR.
Trial, groups not picked at random of 243 high school Biology students in Nigeria · vs the same lessons taught with virtual reality · they rated themselves · ⚠ summary claims more than the results show; numbers unreliable
How solid is this?
- Groups not picked at random
- People rated themselves
- Summary claims more than the results show
- Numbers unreliable
Source
EFFICACY OF AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) AND VIRTUAL REALITY (VR) TECHNOLOGIES ON SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT IN SCIENCE EDUCATION (2025)
DOI: 10.48047/vpt7d147 (opens in a new tab)

