ÜBERMAD

FocusReview

Walks in nature may leave people less angry and tired than built settings

HelpedThe short version

After walking or running in nature, people felt less angry than in built or indoor places.

A woman in a striped jumper and checked trousers walks calmly on a stone slab beside a tall tree.
8
studies pooled
Self-rated
people rated themselves

The review

  1. Who took part

    Sizes ran from 3 to 943 people, with about 38 in a typical study. Most were college students, physically active adults or children, and some studies were of children with ADHD.

  2. What they did

    In most studies, people walked or ran for an hour or less in a park or other green place. Thirteen of the 25 studies had the same people do both.

  3. What happened

    People rated themselves less angry, less sad and less tired after walks or runs in nature than in built or indoor places. Attention tests and tiredness were better after nature, but neither held once starting scores were allowed for. Energy, anxiety, calm, blood pressure and cortisol showed no clear difference.

What the review found

  1. HelpedOther outcomes

    After walking or running in nature, people felt less angry than in built or indoor places.

    Pooled analysis of 8 studies · vs the same activity in a built or indoor place · they rated themselves · ⚠ mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. HelpedOther outcomes

    After walking or running in nature, people felt less sad or low than in built or indoor places.

    Pooled analysis of 5 studies · vs the same activity in a built or indoor place · they rated themselves · ⚠ mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. HelpedOther outcomes

    Walks in nature left people less tired than built places, but not once starting levels were allowed for.

    Pooled analysis of 4 studies · vs the same activity in a built or indoor place · they rated themselves · ⚠ mixes trials with other kinds of study

  4. HelpedFocus

    Attention tests were better after walks in nature than in built places, but not once starting scores were allowed for.

    Pooled analysis of 5 studies · vs the same activity in a built or indoor place · ⚠ mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • People rated themselves
  • Unclear how groups were picked
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study

Source

A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments (2010)

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456 (opens in a new tab)

More on focus

See all