ÜBERMAD

GoalsReview

Setting goals may help people do better at sport, and process goals help most

HelpedThe short version

Setting goals helped people do better at sport than having no goal or being told to do their best.

A boy in a swim cap and goggles on a starting block works one arm forward over his head in a slow freestyle stroke.
27
studies pooled
1,764
people doing sports tasks, from children to adults
Recorded
behaviour was recorded
2 tools
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    The 27 studies included 1,764 people: 1,077 adults and 684 people under 18. There were 794 women, 879 men and 91 whose sex was not reported.

  2. What they did

    Each study set goals for a sports task, such as darts, golf putting or swimming. It compared that with no goal or a do-your-best instruction. Most studies were one session in a lab, and others ran for several sessions or a season.

  3. What happened

    Setting goals helped people do better overall, and process goals, which focus on what you do in a skill, helped most. Learning goals worked no better than having no goal at all. The review used only published studies, which probably made the effects look bigger, and it did not test for missing studies.

What the review found

  1. Helped

    Setting goals helped people do better at sport than having no goal or being told to do their best.

    Pooled analysis of 27 studies with 1,764 people · vs people with no goal or told to do their best · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; the studies disagreed a lot; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. Helped

    Process goals, which focus on what you do in a skill, helped people do better than having no goal.

    Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs people with no goal or told to do their best · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; results look too good to be true; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. Helped

    Performance goals helped people do better at sport than having no goal or being told to do their best.

    Pooled analysis of 16 studies · vs people with no goal or told to do their best · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  4. No difference

    Learning goals worked no better than having no goal at all.

    Pooled analysis of 6 studies · vs people with no goal or told to do their best · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • Large group
  • Behaviour was recorded
  • Results look too good to be true
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study

Source

The performance and psychological effects of goal setting in sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)

DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2022.2116723 (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all