ÜBERMAD

MotivationReview

Education that built confidence may help people with diabetes care for themselves

HelpedThe short version

Across 4 studies, the education made people more confident by three months.

A woman levels a cup of rice with a knife at a demonstration table while a health educator sits still beside her.
4
studies pooled
554
adults with diabetes in 10 studies
Self-rated
people rated themselves
2 tools
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    1,308 people in 10 studies, all aged 17 or over, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Most of the 16 studies in the wider review were in China, Taiwan, Thailand and Malaysia.

  2. What they did

    Most programmes ran as group sessions over 4 to 16 weeks. They set goals, practised and recorded self-care, showed peer examples and demonstrations, and gave encouragement from health staff.

  3. What happened

    Confidence and self-care both rose at both time points, and the rises were larger at 3 to 6 months. Blood sugar (A1C) fell by about 0.6%. Most studies did not assign people to groups by chance, and the paper's numbers do not always match.

What the review found

  1. Across 4 studies, the education made people more confident by three months.

    Pooled analysis of 4 studies with 554 people · vs people who did not get the education · they rated themselves · ⚠ the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. Across 4 studies, the education made people more confident at three to six months.

    Pooled analysis of 4 studies · vs people who did not get the education · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. HelpedGoals

    Across 5 studies, the education got people to do more self-care within three months.

    Pooled analysis of 5 studies · vs people who did not get the education · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  4. HelpedGoals

    Across 4 studies, the education got people to do more self-care three to six months later.

    Pooled analysis of 4 studies · vs people who did not get the education · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • People rated themselves
  • Summary claims more than the results show
  • Numbers unreliable
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study

Source

Self-efficacy-focused education in persons with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)

DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S192571 (opens in a new tab)

More on motivation

See all