Education that built confidence may help people with diabetes care for themselves
HelpedThe short version
Across 4 studies, the education made people more confident by three months.

- 4
- studies pooled
- 554
- adults with diabetes in 10 studies
- Self-rated
- people rated themselves
- 2 tools
- tested
The review
Who took part
1,308 people in 10 studies, all aged 17 or over, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Most of the 16 studies in the wider review were in China, Taiwan, Thailand and Malaysia.
What they did
Most programmes ran as group sessions over 4 to 16 weeks. They set goals, practised and recorded self-care, showed peer examples and demonstrations, and gave encouragement from health staff.
What happened
Confidence and self-care both rose at both time points, and the rises were larger at 3 to 6 months. Blood sugar (A1C) fell by about 0.6%. Most studies did not assign people to groups by chance, and the paper's numbers do not always match.
What the review found
- HelpedMotivation
Across 4 studies, the education made people more confident by three months.
Pooled analysis of 4 studies with 554 people · vs people who did not get the education · they rated themselves · ⚠ the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- HelpedMotivation
Across 4 studies, the education made people more confident at three to six months.
Pooled analysis of 4 studies · vs people who did not get the education · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- HelpedGoals
Across 5 studies, the education got people to do more self-care within three months.
Pooled analysis of 5 studies · vs people who did not get the education · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- HelpedGoals
Across 4 studies, the education got people to do more self-care three to six months later.
Pooled analysis of 4 studies · vs people who did not get the education · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
How solid is this?
- People rated themselves
- Summary claims more than the results show
- Numbers unreliable
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Mixes trials with other kinds of study
Source
Self-efficacy-focused education in persons with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)
DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S192571 (opens in a new tab)

