ÜBERMAD

GoalsPaper

Points, levels and leaderboards led to more tags but did not change motivation

HelpedThe short version

Points, levels or a leaderboard led people to make more tags than the same task with none.

A woman on a block holds a large abstract print with small tags along its lower edge and tilts it gently side to side.
295
adults in an online image-tagging experiment
Randomised
groups picked at random
Recorded
behaviour was recorded
3 tools
tested

The study

  1. Who took part

    295 adults were invited by e-mail from a university's list of people who sign up for studies. There were 93 men, 191 women and 11 people who did not say. The average age was about 33, ranging from 17 to 68.

  2. What they did

    Everyone tagged 15 abstract paintings online, which took about 22 minutes. Three groups had points, a leaderboard with four made-up players, or a bar showing levels. A fourth group had the same task with none of these.

  3. What happened

    Points, levels and leaderboards each led to more tags than the same task with no extras. The leaderboard group made more than the points group. Motivation, feeling in control and feeling capable did not differ between the groups.

What the study found

  1. HelpedGoals

    Points, levels or a leaderboard led people to make more tags than the same task with none.

    Randomised trial of 295 adults in an online image-tagging experiment · vs the same task with no extras · behaviour was recorded

  2. No differenceMotivation

    Points, levels or a leaderboard did not change how motivated people were, compared with the same task alone.

    Randomised trial of 295 adults in an online image-tagging experiment · vs the same task with no extras · behaviour was recorded

How solid is this?

  • Groups picked at random
  • Behaviour was recorded

Source

Do Points, Levels and Leaderboards Harm Intrinsic Motivation? An Empirical Analysis of Common Gamification Elements (2013)

DOI: 10.1145/2583008.2583017 (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all