Programmes for putting things off helped people put things off less, on average
HelpedThe short version
Across 34 comparisons, programmes helped people put things off less than the other group did.

- 34
- studies pooled
- 1,173
- mostly students who put things off
- Self-rated
- people rated themselves
- 2 tools
- tested
The review
Who took part
24 studies with 1,173 people, mostly students. Across the studies, the share of women ranged from 0 to 79 percent.
What they did
Programmes taught ways to stop putting things off, such as planning, challenging unhelpful thoughts and building on strengths. Most of the other groups were on a waiting list, and eight did another activity instead. Programmes ran from one hour to 24 hours in total.
What happened
Compared with the other group, people put things off much less after the programmes, a large change on average. The studies differed a lot, and some studies with weak results seem to be missing. Therapy that challenges unhelpful thoughts seemed best, though the authors call that early.
What the review found
- Helped
Across 34 comparisons, programmes helped people put things off less than the other group did.
Pooled analysis of 34 studies · vs people who waited or did something else · they rated themselves · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
In 11 comparisons, challenging unhelpful thoughts helped people put things off less than those who waited.
Pooled analysis of 11 studies · vs people who waited or did something else · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- No difference
Across 12 comparisons, the gains were still there later, with no extra change against the other group.
Pooled analysis of 12 studies · vs people who waited or did something else · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
How solid is this?
- Large group
- People rated themselves
- Student thesis, not checked by other scientists
- Many people dropped out
- Numbers unreliable
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Signs that small negative studies went unpublished
Source
Overcoming Procrastination? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies (2018)
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.002 (opens in a new tab)

