ÜBERMAD

ProcrastinationReview

Programmes for putting things off helped people put things off less, on average

HelpedThe short version

Across 34 comparisons, programmes helped people put things off less than the other group did.

A young woman in a checked shirt stands at a dorm sink, calmly scrubbing a big mug with a small brush.
34
studies pooled
1,173
mostly students who put things off
Self-rated
people rated themselves
2 tools
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    24 studies with 1,173 people, mostly students. Across the studies, the share of women ranged from 0 to 79 percent.

  2. What they did

    Programmes taught ways to stop putting things off, such as planning, challenging unhelpful thoughts and building on strengths. Most of the other groups were on a waiting list, and eight did another activity instead. Programmes ran from one hour to 24 hours in total.

  3. What happened

    Compared with the other group, people put things off much less after the programmes, a large change on average. The studies differed a lot, and some studies with weak results seem to be missing. Therapy that challenges unhelpful thoughts seemed best, though the authors call that early.

What the review found

  1. Helped

    Across 34 comparisons, programmes helped people put things off less than the other group did.

    Pooled analysis of 34 studies · vs people who waited or did something else · they rated themselves · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. Helped

    In 11 comparisons, challenging unhelpful thoughts helped people put things off less than those who waited.

    Pooled analysis of 11 studies · vs people who waited or did something else · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. No difference

    Across 12 comparisons, the gains were still there later, with no extra change against the other group.

    Pooled analysis of 12 studies · vs people who waited or did something else · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • Large group
  • People rated themselves
  • Student thesis, not checked by other scientists
  • Many people dropped out
  • Numbers unreliable
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study
  • Signs that small negative studies went unpublished

Source

Overcoming Procrastination? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies (2018)

DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.002 (opens in a new tab)

More on procrastination

See all