Workplace mindfulness programmes may lower stress and burnout and may help work performance
HelpedThe short version
Across 23 trials, mindfulness programmes for workers cut stress more than the waiting group did.

- 23
- studies pooled
- 3,090
- workers in 35 trials of mindfulness programmes
- 1 tool
- tested
The review
Who took part
3,090 people took part in 35 trials, and about three in four were women with an average age of about 39. More than half of the trials were in North America.
What they did
Each trial tested a mindfulness programme for workers, and the programmes varied in format and length. Most trials compared it with a waiting group rather than another treatment.
What happened
Stress, anxiety, distress and burnout went down more than in the other groups. Job performance, mindfulness, health and wellbeing went up more, but depression and emotional regulation showed no clear difference. The paper's stress numbers don't match, and some positive results may be too large.
What the review found
- HelpedOther outcomes
Across 23 trials, mindfulness programmes for workers cut stress more than the waiting group did.
Pooled analysis of 23 studies · vs people who were still waiting for the course · ⚠ the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- HelpedOther outcomes
Across 14 trials, mindfulness programmes for workers cut burnout more than the waiting group did.
Pooled analysis of 14 studies · vs people who were still waiting for the course · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- HelpedGoals
Across nine trials, mindfulness programmes for workers raised job performance more than the waiting group did.
Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs people who were still waiting for the course · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- HelpedFocus
Across 20 trials, mindfulness programmes raised mindfulness scores more than the waiting group did.
Pooled analysis of 20 studies · vs people who were still waiting for the course · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
How solid is this?
- Large group
- Numbers unreliable
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Signs that small negative studies went unpublished
Source
Mindfulness-based interventions in the workplace: An inclusive systematic review and meta-analysis of their impact upon wellbeing (2018)
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2018.1519588 (opens in a new tab)

