Managing stress and tracking food seemed to boost confidence in eating well.
HelpedThe short version
Across 54 trials, diet programmes helped people feel more able to eat well than other groups did.

- 54
- studies pooled
- 15,873
- people in 54 trials of healthy-eating programmes
- Self-rated
- people rated themselves
- 3 tools
- tested
The review
Who took part
The 54 trials had 15,873 people, mostly from the USA or Canada. About four in ten trials recruited people with clinical needs, such as patients or people with weight concerns.
What they did
Each programme was compared with a different programme or with nothing. The median programme lasted about two months and had eight sessions.
What happened
Across all 54 trials, diet programmes helped people feel more able to eat well, but the gain was small. Stress management, tracking and goal review each made a clear difference compared with programmes that left them out. Rewards and feedback gave results that were not quite clear, and the tests found signs that studies with weaker results are missing.
What the review found
- Helped
Across 54 trials, diet programmes helped people feel more able to eat well than other groups did.
Pooled analysis of 54 studies with 15,873 people · vs groups that got another programme or nothing · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; signs that small negative studies went unpublished; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Helped
Adding stress management to a programme helped people feel more able to eat well.
Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs programmes that left that part out · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Helped
Prompting people to track their own eating helped them feel more able to eat well.
Pooled analysis of 20 studies · vs programmes that did not ask for tracking · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Helped
Prompting people to review their goals helped them feel more able to eat well.
Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs programmes that did not ask for a review · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
How solid is this?
- Large group
- People rated themselves
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Signs that small negative studies went unpublished
Source
How can self-efficacy be increased? Meta-analysis of dietary interventions (2014)
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2013.813729 (opens in a new tab)

