ÜBERMAD

MotivationReview

Managing stress and tracking food seemed to boost confidence in eating well.

HelpedThe short version

Across 54 trials, diet programmes helped people feel more able to eat well than other groups did.

A calm man in a striped jumper lifts a bowl of oats from a kitchen scale, pausing to look at it.
54
studies pooled
15,873
people in 54 trials of healthy-eating programmes
Self-rated
people rated themselves
3 tools
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    The 54 trials had 15,873 people, mostly from the USA or Canada. About four in ten trials recruited people with clinical needs, such as patients or people with weight concerns.

  2. What they did

    Each programme was compared with a different programme or with nothing. The median programme lasted about two months and had eight sessions.

  3. What happened

    Across all 54 trials, diet programmes helped people feel more able to eat well, but the gain was small. Stress management, tracking and goal review each made a clear difference compared with programmes that left them out. Rewards and feedback gave results that were not quite clear, and the tests found signs that studies with weaker results are missing.

What the review found

  1. Helped

    Across 54 trials, diet programmes helped people feel more able to eat well than other groups did.

    Pooled analysis of 54 studies with 15,873 people · vs groups that got another programme or nothing · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; signs that small negative studies went unpublished; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  2. Helped

    Adding stress management to a programme helped people feel more able to eat well.

    Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs programmes that left that part out · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  3. Helped

    Prompting people to track their own eating helped them feel more able to eat well.

    Pooled analysis of 20 studies · vs programmes that did not ask for tracking · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  4. Helped

    Prompting people to review their goals helped them feel more able to eat well.

    Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs programmes that did not ask for a review · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

How solid is this?

  • Large group
  • People rated themselves
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Signs that small negative studies went unpublished

Source

How can self-efficacy be increased? Meta-analysis of dietary interventions (2014)

DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2013.813729 (opens in a new tab)

More on motivation

See all