Strength exercises may help pupils' thinking skills, but school results are unclear
HelpedThe short version
Across the studies, strength exercise helped thinking skills a little more than no exercise did.

- 1,235
- children and teenagers at school
The review
Who took part
This review combined 10 studies with 1,235 children and teenagers at school, aged 5 to 18. Average ages in the studies ranged from about 9 to about 16.
What they did
Pupils in the strength groups did exercises with free weights, elastic bands, medicine balls, kettlebells or their own body weight. The other groups did no exercise. The programmes differed a lot in how much, how hard and what kind of exercise, and most were run in schools.
What happened
Thinking skills improved a little more than with no exercise. School grades, test scores and on-task behaviour showed no clear difference, but the discussion says these could not be analysed. The authors rated the evidence as low certainty, and there was some sign that weaker studies went unpublished.
What the review found
- HelpedOther outcomes
Across the studies, strength exercise helped thinking skills a little more than no exercise did.
Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs children who did no exercise · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished
- No differenceFocus
Across the studies, strength exercise made no clear difference to staying on task in class.
Pooled analysis of 1 study · vs children who did no exercise · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished
- No differenceGoals
Across the studies, strength exercise made no clear difference to school grades and test scores.
Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs children who did no exercise · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished
How solid is this?
- Large group
- Numbers unreliable
- Summary claims more than the results show
- Signs that small negative studies went unpublished
Source
Effects of Resistance Training on Academic Outcomes in School-Aged Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2023)
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01881-6 (opens in a new tab)

