ÜBERMAD

FocusPaper

Telling students it tested intelligence had mixed effects on how long they kept going

HelpedThe short version

After positive feedback, students not told of the test kept going longer.

A seated student rocks one linked puzzle ring back and forth against another, held at chest height.
145
university students in three lab studies
Recorded
behaviour was recorded
1 tool
tested

The study

  1. Who took part

    145 university students took part in three lab experiments. The first had 48 students, the second 54 (26 men and 28 women), and the third 43 men.

  2. What they did

    Some students were told the task tested intelligence, and others got a plain description. Feedback was positive, about average, or none, and students were then left alone for 2 to 6 minutes.

  3. What happened

    After positive feedback, students told it tested intelligence stayed on about 4 minutes, against about 5. With no feedback, they kept going about 4 minutes, against about 2. With average feedback, 70 in 100 such students kept working, against 48 in 100.

What the study found

  1. HelpedFocus

    After positive feedback, students not told of the test kept going longer.

    Trial of 145 university students in three lab studies · vs students told it measured intelligence · behaviour was recorded

  2. MixedFocus

    With positive feedback, students not told of the test kept going longer. With no feedback, it was the other way round.

    Trial of 145 university students in three lab studies · vs students told it measured intelligence · behaviour was recorded

  3. Students not told of the test rated their choice and enjoyment higher.

    Trial of 145 university students in three lab studies · vs students told it measured intelligence · behaviour was recorded

How solid is this?

  • Behaviour was recorded

Source

Ego-Involved Persistence: When Free-Choice Behavior Is Not Intrinsically Motivated (1991)

More on focus

See all