ÜBERMAD

GoalsReview

Talks matched to each person's readiness lowered blood sugar and improved self-care.

HelpedThe short version

Across 24 studies, talks matched to readiness lowered HbA1c, a blood sugar test, more than usual care did.

A man on a wooden bench lifts a snack bar and tucks it into his jacket pocket while a nurse sits calmly beside him.
24
studies pooled
4,214
adults with type 2 diabetes in 30 trials
3 tools
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    4,214 adults with type 2 diabetes took part in 30 trials, mostly in China. Their average age ranged from about 41 to 75, and ten trials focused on people over 60.

  2. What they did

    Nurses usually led the talks: one to 22 talks, about 30 minutes each, over three to 12 months. Each talk matched its advice to where the person was in changing, such as just thinking about it or already trying. The other group got usual care or standard teaching about diabetes.

  3. What happened

    Compared with the other groups, the blood sugar test HbA1c fell more, by about 0.9 percentage points. Self-care and confidence also rose more than in the other groups, though the studies varied widely. The authors rate the HbA1c evidence as strong, and a check found signs that some results were not published.

What the review found

  1. HelpedOther outcomes

    Across 24 studies, talks matched to readiness lowered HbA1c, a blood sugar test, more than usual care did.

    Pooled analysis of 24 studies · vs people who got usual care or standard teaching · the authors rated their certainty high · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  2. HelpedOther outcomes

    Across 23 studies, talks matched to readiness lowered fasting blood sugar more than usual care did.

    Pooled analysis of 23 studies · vs people who got usual care or standard teaching · the authors rated their certainty moderate · ⚠ signs that small negative studies went unpublished; results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  3. HelpedGoals

    Across 11 studies, people said they did more self-care after talks than after usual care.

    Pooled analysis of 11 studies · vs people who got usual care or standard teaching · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  4. Across seven studies, people felt more sure of themselves after talks than after usual care.

    Pooled analysis of 7 studies · vs people who got usual care or standard teaching · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

How solid is this?

  • Large group
  • Results look too good to be true
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Signs that small negative studies went unpublished

Source

Effectiveness of Transtheoretical Model-Based Motivational Interviewing on Glycemic Control Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials (2025)

DOI: 10.1111/wvn.70041 (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all