ÜBERMAD

FocusReview

Brain training may help adults with MS pay attention

HelpedThe short version

Across 20 studies, brain training helped people pay attention more than other groups did.

A woman of about forty-five at a desk clicks a computer mouse again and again, calm and focused on the unseen screen.
20
studies pooled
982
adults with multiple sclerosis
1 tool
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    This review combined 20 studies with 982 adults who had multiple sclerosis. About 78 in 100 were women, and average ages in the studies ranged from 33 to 59.

  2. What they did

    Each study gave at least 4 hours of computer exercises that changed to fit each person. The other groups had no contact, were still waiting to start, or did an easier task or education about MS. Some studies also added strategy training, physiotherapy or counselling.

  3. What happened

    Attention and overall thinking improved more than in the other groups, and other thinking skills and memory improved a little. Mood, anxiety, quality of life, daily living, fatigue and working memory showed no clear change. Gains faded once training stopped, and most studies were at high risk of bias.

What the review found

  1. HelpedFocus

    Across 20 studies, brain training helped people pay attention more than other groups did.

    Pooled analysis of 20 studies with 982 people · vs people who got no contact, easier tasks or education · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  2. HelpedOther outcomes

    Across 20 studies, brain training improved overall thinking more than other groups did.

    Pooled analysis of 20 studies with 982 people · vs people who got no contact, easier tasks or education · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  3. No differenceOther outcomes

    Across 9 studies, brain training did no better than other groups for mood, worry or quality of life.

    Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs people who got no contact, easier tasks or education · they rated themselves · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; signs that small negative studies went unpublished; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

  4. No differenceOther outcomes

    Across 3 studies, brain training did no better than other groups for daily living.

    Pooled analysis of 3 studies · vs people who got no contact, easier tasks or education · ⚠ most studies had serious flaws; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited

How solid is this?

  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Signs that small negative studies went unpublished

Source

Computerized Cognitive Training in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2019)

DOI: 10.1177/1545968319860490 (opens in a new tab)

More on focus

See all