ÜBERMAD

Time managementPaper

A chatbot in a to-do app cut putting things off, not overall time management

No differenceThe short version

Adding a chat bot coach to a to-do app didn't help people manage time better than the app alone.

A student sits on the edge of her bed, backpack at her feet, raising her phone to read a message and lowering it to her lap to reply.
85
Korean university students who put things off
Randomised
groups picked at random
Self-rated
people rated themselves
3 tools
tested

The study

  1. Who took part

    85 university students in South Korea who put things off a lot, about 20 years old on average; 37 were women. 47 got the chatbot and 38 used the app alone.

  2. What they did

    Both groups used the same to-do app with alarms each morning and evening. They used it at least 3 to 4 times a week for a month. The chatbot group also chatted with a bot called Moa. It walked them through five steps of looking back on how they worked. Then it gave advice matched to their main reason for putting things off.

  3. What happened

    After a month, overall time management improved in both groups by about the same amount. Students with the chatbot said they put things off less than the app-only group, but planning and other skills did not differ. Parts of the paper's tables are garbled, some numbers don't match, and the authors claim more than the results show.

What the study found

  1. No differenceTime management

    Adding a chat bot coach to a to-do app didn't help people manage time better than the app alone.

    Small randomised trial of 85 Korean university students who put things off · vs the same to-do app without the chatbot · they rated themselves · ⚠ summary claims more than the results show; numbers unreliable

  2. Students who also chatted with a coaching chatbot put things off less than those who used the app alone.

    Small randomised trial of 85 Korean university students who put things off · vs the same to-do app without the chatbot · they rated themselves · ⚠ summary claims more than the results show; numbers unreliable

How solid is this?

  • Groups picked at random
  • Small group
  • People rated themselves
  • Summary claims more than the results show
  • Numbers unreliable

Source

Development of a Mobile Intervention for Procrastination Augmented With a Semigenerative Chatbot for University Students: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (2025)

DOI: 10.2196/53133 (opens in a new tab)

More on time management

See all