ÜBERMAD

MotivationPaper

One lesson on why math is useful made teens rate math as more useful

HelpedThe short version

About a month after one lesson on math's real-life uses, students rated math more useful than the waiting classes.

A teenager in checked shirt and striped dungarees hammers a nail into a wooden box, holding a set square to its corner.
1,744
ninth-grade students in Germany
Randomised
groups picked at random
Self-rated
people rated themselves
2 tools
tested

The study

  1. Who took part

    1,744 ninth-grade students in 78 classes at 28 schools in Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany. They were about 15 on average, and just over half were girls.

  2. What they did

    Classes had one 90-minute lesson, taught by trained university students or by their own math teachers. For about 45 minutes, it covered effort, how students judge their own skill and how math is useful. Then for about 40 minutes, students read quotes from young adults about how math helped them. They thought about how math fits their own lives. The other classes waited and got the lesson after the study.

  3. What happened

    About 4 weeks later, students in both lesson groups rated math as more useful than the waiting classes. Three months later the gap was smaller and no longer clear, though the paper's summary says it held. Interest in math and belief in their own math skill did not change. Students in the lesson groups said math cost them more effort and time.

What the study found

  1. Helped

    About a month after one lesson on math's real-life uses, students rated math more useful than the waiting classes.

    Large randomised trial of 1,744 ninth-grade students in Germany · vs classes still waiting for the lesson · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole groups were assigned, not people; summary claims more than the results show

  2. No difference

    The lesson did not raise interest in math or belief in math skill, and students said math cost them more.

    Large randomised trial of 1,744 ninth-grade students in Germany · vs classes still waiting for the lesson · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole groups were assigned, not people; summary claims more than the results show

How solid is this?

  • Groups picked at random
  • Large group
  • Plan registered in advance
  • People rated themselves
  • Whole groups were assigned, not people
  • Summary claims more than the results show

Source

The potential of relevance interventions for scaling up: A cluster-randomized trial testing the effectiveness of a relevance intervention in math classrooms. (2021)

DOI: 10.1037/edu0000663 (opens in a new tab)

More on motivation

See all