ÜBERMAD

GoalsReview

A guided talk gave patients a modest edge, with clear gains on alcohol.

HelpedThe short version

Across 48 studies, people given a guided talk improved more often than other groups did.

A man on a bed edge opens one palm toward a calm woman on a rolling stool, as he talks through his own reasons.
48
studies pooled
9,618
patients in medical care
1 tool
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    9,618 people took part in 48 studies. The studies were in hospitals, clinics and emergency rooms.

  2. What they did

    Patients had a guided talk with a trained helper about their own reasons to change. The talks lasted about 106 minutes on average. The other groups got usual care, a leaflet or a waiting list, and their time averaged 30 minutes.

  3. What happened

    Overall, people who had the talk were more likely to improve. Alcohol use, smoking, sitting less and keeping track of their health all improved more. Safe sex, healthy eating, medicines and blood sugar showed no clear difference. Results varied a lot between studies.

What the review found

  1. HelpedGoals

    Across 48 studies, people given a guided talk improved more often than other groups did.

    Pooled analysis of 48 studies with 9,618 people · vs people on usual care, a leaflet or a waiting list · ⚠ results look too good to be true; the studies disagreed a lot

  2. HelpedGoals

    Across 9 studies, people given a guided talk drank less alcohol than other groups did.

    Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs people on usual care, a leaflet or a waiting list · ⚠ results look too good to be true

  3. HelpedGoals

    Across 5 studies, people given a guided talk moved more and sat less than other groups.

    Pooled analysis of 5 studies · vs people on usual care, a leaflet or a waiting list · ⚠ results look too good to be true

  4. Across 7 studies, people given a guided talk felt more confident about changing.

    Pooled analysis of 7 studies · vs people on usual care, a leaflet or a waiting list · they rated themselves · ⚠ results look too good to be true

How solid is this?

  • Large group
  • Summary claims more than the results show

Source

Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2013)

DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.012 (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all