ÜBERMAD

Other outcomesReview

Teaching people about cancer pain eased pain a little, pooled studies found

HelpedThe short version

In nine studies, teaching helped people know more and feel better about painkillers than usual care did.

A calm man with a beard shows a woman in a striped cardigan a booklet, lifting its corner a little as she listens.
9
studies pooled
Self-rated
people rated themselves
1 tool
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    The review covered 21 studies with 3,501 adults who had cancer pain. Most of the studies were in North America, and most of the people were women.

  2. What they did

    Most people had one-to-one coaching on cancer pain and painkillers. Most also got a booklet to keep. People were checked again one to 26 weeks later, usually about four weeks.

  3. What happened

    Average pain was about one point lower on a 0 to 10 scale, and worst pain about 0.8 lower. Knowledge and views improved more than in the other groups, but taking medicines as prescribed showed no clear benefit. Pain getting in the way of daily life showed no clear benefit either, and the studies varied a lot.

What the review found

  1. Helped

    In nine studies, teaching helped people know more and feel better about painkillers than usual care did.

    Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs usual care or similar contact · they rated themselves · ⚠ the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. Helped

    In 12 studies, the teaching cut average pain more than usual care or similar contact did.

    Pooled analysis of 12 studies · vs usual care or similar contact · they rated themselves · ⚠ the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. Helped

    Across the pooled studies, the teaching lowered worst pain more than usual care or similar contact did.

    Pooled analysis of 0 studies · vs usual care or similar contact · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • People rated themselves
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study

Source

How effective are patient-based educational interventions in the management of cancer pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis (2009)

DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.01.016 (opens in a new tab)

More research