ÜBERMAD

GoalsReview

Goals, reminders and rewards got people to do more green actions.

HelpedThe short version

Across 15 comparisons, setting goals, such as cutting power use by 20%, helped people act more green.

A woman in a striped jumper lifts a glass jar from a bag by her door and drops it into a recycling crate, calm and steady.
15
studies pooled
Recorded
behaviour was recorded
5 tools
tested

The review

  1. Who took part

    The paper does not say how many people took part or how old they were. It pooled 87 published studies from 1980 to 2009. Most measured recycling, saving energy or water, and travel.

  2. What they did

    Each study tried a way to get people to act more, such as goals, reminders, rewards or feedback. Most studies mixed several of these together. The other group got nothing extra or was measured only at the start.

  3. What happened

    On average, people did more green actions than the other group across 253 comparisons. Goals and reminders had among the largest average effects; instructions and feedback had among the smallest. The paper could not test which method worked best, so the ranking is a rough guide.

What the review found

  1. Helped

    Across 15 comparisons, setting goals, such as cutting power use by 20%, helped people act more green.

    Pooled analysis of 15 studies · vs people who got nothing extra · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. Helped

    Across 44 comparisons, reminders about when to act helped people act more green.

    Pooled analysis of 44 studies · vs people who got no reminders · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. Helped

    Across 36 comparisons, rewards such as vouchers, bus passes and prizes helped people do more green actions.

    Pooled analysis of 36 studies · vs people who got no reward · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  4. Helped

    Across 60 comparisons, feedback like power bills helped, though less than goals or reminders.

    Pooled analysis of 60 studies · vs people who got nothing extra · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • Behaviour was recorded
  • Summary claims more than the results show
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study
  • The review didn't check the studies' quality or look for missing studies

Source

Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science: Meta-Analysis of Proenvironmental Behavior Experiments (2012)

DOI: 10.1177/0013916511402673 (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all