Self-management with goals and feedback may help adults cut blood sugar
HelpedThe short version
Across 16 trials, programmes with goals, feedback and planning lowered blood sugar more than others did.

- 16
- studies pooled
- 3,545
- adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes
- 4 tools
- tested
The review
Who took part
3,545 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes took part in 16 trials. In each trial, the average age was 51 to 64, and in six trials most people were from ethnic minority groups.
What they did
The programmes used goals, feedback, problem-solving and action plans. The comparison groups were usual care, teaching alone, a placebo or a group that started later.
What happened
The blood sugar test (HbA1c) fell by about 0.4 more than in other groups, but the drop faded after about a year. Self-care actions showed no clear change, while confidence rose and stress fell. The paper's quality-of-life numbers don't agree, so we can't give a result.
What the review found
- HelpedOther outcomes
Across 16 trials, programmes with goals, feedback and planning lowered blood sugar more than others did.
- Action: Set a specific goaltested
- Action: Solve problems step by steptested
- Rule: Get feedback on your progresstested
- Rule: Write down when and wheretested
Pooled analysis of 16 studies with 3,545 people · vs people who got usual care or other treatment · ⚠ the studies disagreed a lot; whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- No differenceGoals
Across 5 studies, these programmes made no clear difference to self-care actions.
- Action: Set a specific goaltested
- Action: Solve problems step by steptested
- Rule: Get feedback on your progresstested
- Rule: Write down when and wheretested
Pooled analysis of 5 studies with 656 people · vs people who got usual care or other treatment · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- HelpedMotivation
Across 3 studies, these programmes made people more sure of managing their diabetes.
- Action: Set a specific goaltested
- Action: Solve problems step by steptested
- Rule: Get feedback on your progresstested
- Rule: Write down when and wheretested
Pooled analysis of 3 studies with 533 people · vs people who got usual care or other treatment · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- HelpedOther outcomes
Across 2 studies, these programmes left people less stressed about diabetes.
- Action: Set a specific goaltested
- Action: Solve problems step by steptested
- Rule: Get feedback on your progresstested
- Rule: Write down when and wheretested
Pooled analysis of 2 studies with 506 people · vs people who got usual care or other treatment · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
How solid is this?
- Large group
- Numbers unreliable
- Summary claims more than the results show
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
Source
Effectiveness of Interactive Self-Management Interventions in Individuals With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2016)


