Extra help with TB medicines improved results, but studies varied.
HelpedThe short version
Across 4 trials, reminders and contact after missed doses helped more people succeed at TB treatment.

- 4
- studies pooled
- 3 tools
- tested
The review
Who took part
The review covered 129 studies, some trials and some that followed groups over time. The people were adults and children on TB treatment.
What they did
Studies compared extra support with routine care. The support was reminders, rewards or teaching. Others compared a health worker or family member watching each dose with taking medicines alone.
What happened
In trials, reminders helped more people finish TB treatment, and rewards or help with costs did too, by small amounts. Teaching did not change treatment success in trials. It did help more people attend all their appointments in one trial.
What the review found
- Helped
Across 4 trials, reminders and contact after missed doses helped more people succeed at TB treatment.
Pooled analysis of 4 studies · vs routine care without reminders · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
Across 3 trials, rewards and help with costs or travel helped more people succeed at TB treatment.
Pooled analysis of 3 studies · vs routine care without rewards or help · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
In one trial, teaching about TB helped more people attend all their appointments.
Pooled analysis of 1 study · vs routine care without teaching · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
How solid is this?
- Summary claims more than the results show
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Mixes trials with other kinds of study
Source
Adherence interventions and outcomes of tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials and observational studies (2018)
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002595 (opens in a new tab)

