Quit programmes for teens may work: 9 in 100 quit, against 6 in 100
HelpedThe short version
Quit programmes for teens worked: about 9 in 100 quit, against about 6 in 100 in the other groups.

- 48
- studies pooled
- Self-rated
- people rated themselves
- 2 tools
- tested
The review
Who took part
The 48 studies included teenagers who smoked, just over half of them girls. On average the youngest were about 14 at the start, and the oldest about 19 at the last check.
What they did
Each programme was compared with usual care or a basic version of it. Most were held in classrooms or school clinics, and most had at least five sessions.
What happened
Across the 48 studies, the programmes helped more teens quit than the other groups did, and the gain lasted past a year. Programmes built on motivation, coping skills, and pressure from friends and the media each helped too.
What the review found
- Helped
Quit programmes for teens worked: about 9 in 100 quit, against about 6 in 100 in the other groups.
Pooled analysis of 48 studies · vs usual care or a basic version · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
Programmes that dealt with doubts about quitting helped about 4 more in 100 teens quit.
Pooled analysis of 15 studies · vs usual care or a basic version · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
Programmes that taught smoking diaries and how to cope with stress helped about 5 more in 100 teens quit.
Pooled analysis of 17 studies · vs usual care or a basic version · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
- Helped
Programmes that dealt with pressure from friends and the media helped about 4 more in 100 teens quit.
Pooled analysis of 8 studies · vs usual care or a basic version · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study
How solid is this?
- People rated themselves
- Unclear how groups were picked
- Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
- Mixes trials with other kinds of study
Source
A Meta-Analysis of Teen Cigarette Smoking Cessation (2006)
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.549 (opens in a new tab)

