ÜBERMAD

GoalsReview

A group course for long-term illness may help people exercise and feel confident

HelpedThe short version

People in the small group course did more aerobic exercise four to six months later.

A woman with one hand on her hip lifts each leg out to the side in turn, standing on a wooden platform.
9
studies pooled
8,688
adults with long-term illness
Self-rated
people rated themselves
1 tool
used

The review

  1. Who took part

    8,688 adults with long-term illness took part in 23 studies, mostly in the US, Britain or Canada. Three in four were women.

  2. What they did

    People joined a six-week course in small groups, led by trained leaders, to build confidence and skills for managing their illness. Some studies compared it with another group; others only checked people before and after the course.

  3. What happened

    Compared with the start or another group, people exercised more, felt more confident and used more ways to manage symptoms. Many gains lasted nine to twelve months, but tiredness and hospital stays improved only at four to six months. Pain and breathlessness improved later, and daily ability did not change.

What the review found

  1. HelpedGoals

    People in the small group course did more aerobic exercise four to six months later.

    Pooled analysis of 9 studies · vs other groups, or the same people at the start · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  2. HelpedGoals

    Nine to twelve months later, people in the group course were still doing more to manage their symptoms.

    Pooled analysis of 4 studies · vs other groups, or the same people at the start · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  3. People in the group course felt more confident about managing their health four to six months later.

    Pooled analysis of 5 studies · vs other groups, or the same people at the start · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

  4. Nine to twelve months later, people in the group course still felt more confident, though less than before.

    Pooled analysis of 3 studies · vs other groups, or the same people at the start · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited; mixes trials with other kinds of study

How solid is this?

  • Large group
  • People rated themselves
  • Unclear how groups were picked
  • Whole programmes were tested, so no single part can be credited
  • Mixes trials with other kinds of study
  • The review didn't check the studies' quality or look for missing studies

Source

A Meta-Analysis of Health Status, Health Behaviors, and Health Care Utilization Outcomes of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (2013)

DOI: 10.5888/pcd10.120112 (opens in a new tab)

More on goals

See all