A leaderboard got people to list more uses than a do-your-best goal
HelpedThe short version
A leaderboard got people to list more uses than being told to do their best.

- 240
- university students in a brainstorming test
- Randomised
- groups picked at random
- Recorded
- behaviour was recorded
- 2 tools
- tested
The study
Who took part
240 university students were in the results, mostly women, average age about 23. The study ran online in the US.
What they did
Everyone had 12 minutes to list uses for a knife. One group was told to do their best. Others had a goal of 15, 39 or 53 uses, or a leaderboard with scores set in advance.
What happened
The leaderboard group listed about 38 uses, against about 24 for the do-your-best group. It did about as well as the group with a goal of 39 uses, which listed about 37. People who were more committed to their goal listed more uses.
What the study found
- Helped
A leaderboard got people to list more uses than being told to do their best.
Randomised trial of 240 university students in a brainstorming test · vs people told to do their best · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ only counted people who finished
- No difference
A leaderboard got people to list about as many uses as a goal of 39 did.
Randomised trial of 240 university students in a brainstorming test · vs people with a goal of 39 uses · behaviour was recorded · ⚠ only counted people who finished
How solid is this?
- Groups picked at random
- Behaviour was recorded
- Only counted people who finished
Source
Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment (2015)
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008 (opens in a new tab)

