Feedback cut students' drinking, but not their alcohol problems
HelpedThe short version
A one-hour feedback talk and a house session helped members drink less than usual care did.

- 120
- first-year fraternity members
- Randomised
- groups picked at random
- Self-rated
- people rated themselves
- 3 tools
- tested
The study
Who took part
The study began with 159 first-year fraternity members. 120 of them were still in the study one year later. They came from 12 fraternities at one large university on the US West Coast. On average they were about 19.
What they did
Six fraternities had a one-hour talk on each member's drinking. They also had a one-hour group session. Six other fraternities got usual care, one lecture on alcohol.
What happened
Members in feedback fraternities fell from about 15 drinks a week to about 12. Members in usual-care fraternities rose from about 16 to about 18. Alcohol problems did not change differently between the two groups. Peer interviewers cut peak blood alcohol more than staff did, but those groups started at different levels.
What the study found
- HelpedGoals
A one-hour feedback talk and a house session helped members drink less than usual care did.
- Action: Learn how the problem workstested
- Action: Talk through your mixed feelings about changingtested
- Rule: Get feedback on your progresstested
- Rule: With a coach or therapistused
- Rule: Practise with a groupused
Randomised trial of 120 first-year fraternity members · vs fraternities that got usual care, a lecture on alcohol · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole groups were assigned, not people; only counted people who finished
- HelpedGoals
The same feedback also lowered typical peak blood alcohol more than usual care did.
- Action: Learn how the problem workstested
- Action: Talk through your mixed feelings about changingtested
- Rule: Get feedback on your progresstested
- Rule: With a coach or therapistused
- Rule: Practise with a groupused
Randomised trial of 120 first-year fraternity members · vs fraternities that got usual care, a lecture on alcohol · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole groups were assigned, not people; only counted people who finished
- No differenceOther outcomes
The feedback did not cut alcohol problems or signs of dependence more than usual care did.
- Action: Learn how the problem workstested
- Action: Talk through your mixed feelings about changingtested
- Rule: Get feedback on your progresstested
- Rule: With a coach or therapistused
- Rule: Practise with a groupused
Randomised trial of 120 first-year fraternity members · vs fraternities that got usual care, a lecture on alcohol · they rated themselves · ⚠ whole groups were assigned, not people; only counted people who finished
How solid is this?
- Groups picked at random
- People rated themselves
- Whole groups were assigned, not people
- Only counted people who finished
Source
Evaluating a Brief Alcohol Intervention with Fraternities (2001)


